76 SWB 300 6 build

No tech discussion, please

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
agrust
New Member
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:09 am

76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by agrust »

New to the forum. I grew up driving a 77 custom light green f100 SWB 4x4 with a 4 speed and dad dropped a 400 in it because he wanted the torque. This was a farm and coyote hunting rig. I have a line on a 76 SWB 2wd that appears the same color. The interior is remarkably new. The exterior is nearly damage free. Has some rust in the normal places, cab corners, over the rear wheel. I haven't got to examine in person yet. It has a 300 with a 3 on the tree. I have no idea about power steering or breaks yet. the tailgate and bed are super nice and dent free. I am hoping to see it today. If I get it I'll post pics. I like the idea of the 300 and 3 on the tree. i'll fix the rust, and paint the whole thing back to the light green color. What say you? is the 3 on the tree too stoopid?.. i kinda like it.
Aaron
User avatar
sargentrs
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 9866
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:30 am
Location: Georgia, Jasper

Re: 76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by sargentrs »

:wel: from Georgia! The 3 on the tree is most definitely not stupid. Once you master it, it's pretty cool. One benefit is that you won't have to worry about anybody else borrowing your truck because they won't be able to drive it. :lol: And the 300 inline 6 is one of the best engines ever made.
Randy
1970 F100 Sport Custom Limited LWB, 302cid, 3 on the tree. NO A/C, NO P/S, NO P/B. Currently in 1000 pcs while rebuilding. Project thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=59995 Plan: 351w, C4, LSD, pwr front disc, p/s, a/c, bucket seats, new interior and paint.
1987 F-150 XLT Lariat, 5.0/C6 auto.
Lone Ranger
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:27 pm
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: 76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by Lone Ranger »

I'd have to agree with Sargenters about the 300 straight 6. They are bullet proof.
1972 f100 4x4 4 inch lift with dump box kit-sold
1969 f250 4x4 highboy in progress.
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=85251
Kyle
User avatar
ok68crewcab
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:08 pm
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma

Re: 76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by ok68crewcab »

sargentrs wrote: And the 300 inline 6 is one of the best engines ever made.

Agreed, 30 plus year production run for the 300 six. Under appreciated engine.
2 Blessed 2 Be Stressed
User avatar
67mann
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1705
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:19 am
Location: NY..Mt.Morris 3rdgen. homestead

Re: 76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by 67mann »

:yt: :yt: first truck I ever bought....76 3on tree 300 six and then had another later in life(no 2nd gear :D :lol: )for awhile. Had a 96 300 six with a 4spd in it and it just wasn't the same :(
I've had enough and I'm not alone
http://s267.photobucket.com/albums/ii304/67mann/
Maximus
New Member
New Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:31 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA

Re: 76 SWB 300 6 build

Post by Maximus »

I love my '72 SWB I6 and 3OTT, My rig originally had the smaller 6 but got a crate 300 some 8 or 9 years ago (previous owner)

great little truck, I put a Offy intake and edelbrock 500cfm carb on it (too many problems with my Holley 390cfm) and its a great little runner. I converted my manual steering to power steering....... it was a PAIN to find a original power steering 3spd column, so many 3 speeds in the early 70's were manual steering. hopefully for your sake it already had pwr steering.

Its a great truck, and I feel bad I dont drive it more. i6 engines are great!

3OTT - or 3 on the tree - is great for keeping open floorspace, the lady can ride in the middle without getting in your way. or you could ride 3 deep if thats your style. I like the 3OTT setup, when my column isnt acting up!
1972 Ford F100 SWB Styleside 300ci I6 3OTT
1965 Mustang 289 T5 4 Weel Disc Brakes
1972 Chevy Blazer 4x4 350/350
1955 Chevy Big Window SWB Stepside
Post Reply