Long beds vs short beds

No tech discussion, please

Moderator: FORDification

NM5K
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:52 am
Location: Texas, Houston
Contact:

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by NM5K »

The bed on my 68 is actually about 7 feet long.. It's a utility bed, and slightly shorter than a full
8 foot bed. The frame was trimmed a bit off the back.. Which could cause problems if I ever decided
to put a normal 8 ft bed on it.. So I'm probably stuck with the ute bed.. But I still have my 74 dent
with the regular 8 ft bed if I really needed the length.
1968 F-250 / 300 six / T-18
Dana 60 - 4.10 Limited Slip
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by Ranchero50 »

After running around in my extended frame flat bed I'd prefer a short bed.

Strapping everything becomes a PITA when the straps are frozen.

However, loading firewood in anything with sides is a PITA as well.

11' bed makes getting 12' + lengths of lumber easier.
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
Insane 1
New Member
New Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:36 am

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by Insane 1 »

Long beds are for the people that can't afford a short bed......
User avatar
wndsofchng06
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:41 pm
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by wndsofchng06 »

I love having a long bed, since I use mine as a work truck! Also, due to being less popular, they are cheaper to buy!
ultraranger
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1147
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: Arkansas, Camden

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by ultraranger »

I have a short bed just because I prefer the look of a short bed. I didn't buy my truck for utility purposes. I bought it to eventually make a nice cruiser out of it.

This wasn't long after I bought it and it didn't have a rear bumper then but, if I needed to haul something long with it, well, that's what they make trailers for.

Image
Steve

1969 SWB F100 Ranger. 240-6, C-4, 9" N-case 31-spline Traction-Lok w/3.50 gears.

1968 Mustang. My high school car. Owned since 1982.

2003 Azure Blue Mustang Mach1.
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by elgemcdlf »

Insane 1 wrote:Long beds are for the people that can't afford a short bed......
That's just plain mean. I have a SWB because it is my preference. I have seen plenty of LWB trucks worth way more than mine. I understand SWB trucks are more up front but both make sweet looking trucks when finished.
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by elgemcdlf »

ultraranger wrote:I have a short bed just because I prefer the look of a short bed. I didn't buy my truck for utility purposes. I bought it to eventually make a n
cruiser out of it.

This wasn't long after I bought it and it didn't have a rear bumper then but, if I needed to haul something long with it, well, that's what they make trailers for.

Image
Steve I can no longer (being of good conscience) allow you to degrade yourself with such an ugly truck. Being the wonderful man I am I am willing to pay shipping to have that truck sent to me so you will no longer be embarrassed to be seen in it. Limited time offer. After that you will have to pay me.
chicof100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by chicof100 »

My main truck is a 64 long bed. I've had three bumps but can't seem to hang onto them. I sell them before I can even get pictures of them.
The long bed is the way to go. Full sheets of plywood lay nicely with the tailgate closed. Plenty of space to haul whatever you need.
I had a couple of bikers come up to me at the Temecula Rod Run and commented that the long bed is whats needed to haul a harley when it breaks down. One of them said that every club has a long bed in their arsenal.
F100 Western National 2013 001.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1964 f100
292 yblock
1969 Ranger
Loving all ford vehicles
ultraranger
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1147
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: Arkansas, Camden

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by ultraranger »

elgemcdlf wrote:
ultraranger wrote:I have a short bed just because I prefer the look of a short bed. I didn't buy my truck for utility purposes. I bought it to eventually make a nice cruiser out of it.

This wasn't long after I bought it and it didn't have a rear bumper then but, if I needed to haul something long with it, well, that's what they make trailers for.

Image
Steve I can no longer (being of good conscience) allow you to degrade yourself with such an ugly truck. Being the wonderful man I am I am willing to pay shipping to have that truck sent to me so you will no longer be embarrassed to be seen in it. Limited time offer. After that you will have to pay me.
Yeah, it's an ugly beast but, I'll just have to bear the shame of calling it mine.

However, if it follows the story line of "The Ugly Duckling," it will eventually be a beautiful 'swan.' :wink:
Steve

1969 SWB F100 Ranger. 240-6, C-4, 9" N-case 31-spline Traction-Lok w/3.50 gears.

1968 Mustang. My high school car. Owned since 1982.

2003 Azure Blue Mustang Mach1.
User avatar
Jacksdad
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:52 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by Jacksdad »

Ranchero50 wrote:After running around in my extended frame flat bed I'd prefer a short bed.

Strapping everything becomes a PITA when the straps are frozen.

However, loading firewood in anything with sides is a PITA as well.

11' bed makes getting 12' + lengths of lumber easier.
11" is in the ball park for a flat bed/stake bed I'm contemplating for my F350. I saw the thread detailing Lou's build, and I was wondering what your wheelbase is? I was originally going to go with a LWB bed and make some dually fenders fit, but it turns out my w/b is 159" so that nixed that idea. Don't feel like welding two beds together (although it would make one hell of a truck...). From the pics I've seen, your chassis looks to be about the same length.
1971 DRW F350 cab and chassis with an Open Road motorhome conversion, Dana 70, 352 (originally 390)/C6, PS, power front discs, and 159" w/b.
User avatar
flyboy2610
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4901
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by flyboy2610 »

It all comes down to what YOU want to do with YOUR truck. If you want to build a hot rod cruiser, a short bed would be the way to go. If you want your truck to to do real honest-to-goodness truck work, get the long bed.
Whatever floats your boat. :wink:
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
Red Green

If you're going to live like there's no hell...............
you'd better be right.
http://theworldasiseeit-flyboy2610.blog ... ee-it.html
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by Ranchero50 »

Jacksdad wrote:11' is in the ball park for a flat bed/stake bed I'm contemplating for my F350. I saw the thread detailing Lou's build, and I was wondering what your wheelbase is? I was originally going to go with a LWB bed and make some dually fenders fit, but it turns out my w/b is 159" so that nixed that idea. Don't feel like welding two beds together (although it would make one hell of a truck...). From the pics I've seen, your chassis looks to be about the same length.
I like it. I built mine to tilt (almost dump, lol) and the short overhang allows me to hitch easily and keeps the overall length almost manageable. This truck is not meant for normal parking lots or tight turning areas. Actually it sucks in close quarters. Three point turn in five or seven go's.
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
70short4x4
New Member
New Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by 70short4x4 »

LMAO at all of the "I have a long bed because I use it for real truck stuff" comments. Give me a break. I guarantee my 01 F350 with 6.5 ft bed has done way more work than 95% of the long bed bumps in here. The "real trucks have long beds" bs annoys me if you can't tell :wink: Short bed bumps just simply look better if you ask me. More proportionate. Long beds look like boats if they aren't lifted. I do like lifted long beds (I'm not a complete long bed hater :) I grew up in a 72 long bed bump). My shortbed can do anything your long bed can do...but just looks better doing it 8)
User avatar
1972hiboy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:44 pm
Location: California, Santa Cruz

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by 1972hiboy »

Well since this is a opinion thread ill throw my :2cents: in. I grew up surrounded by bumps. My dad had a 69 f250 and my uncle still has his 70 f250 CS. Both were used for work. my dad did firewood and my uncle did appliances. so the trucks were worked hard, it was essential to have a 8ft bed and the larger brakes. plus for trips to the dirtbike park we could fit the bikes and gear in the back and still close the tailgate. handy. So it comes down to what you plan on using the truck for. Short beds in these years only came in a half ton so thats a lighter chassis and brakes( unless a f250 crewcab). Which is fine for light work and normal driving. For more agressive loads and work the f250/f350 are much more appropriate. Sure you can load down your 1/2 ton with 1 ton worth of stuff but can you stop it?
Rich
1973 f350 super c/s 460/c6 22k orig miles
1972 f350 srw crewcab special 390
1972 f250 4x4 sport custom 390fe Red
1972 f250 4x4 custom 360 FE " Ranger Ric"
1972 f250 4x4 custom 84k og miles 390
1971 f250 4x4 sport custom 56k og miles. 360
1970 f250 4x4 428 fe hp60 205 d60
Dont eat yellow snow.....
jeffery2304
New Member
New Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:53 am

Re: Long beds vs short beds

Post by jeffery2304 »

SevNT2Bump wrote:I do understand the desire for the short bed for street performance, but for me, the ratio between the cab and front section looks out of balance with the short bed.

Are they long beds or standard beds?


This comment has always been mine to.. has anyone taken a measurement of the bed to cab length. the short beds have always looked odd to me because the bed,even if it isnt has always looked shorter than the cab. out of balance is how it looks to me to.
Post Reply